朝日新聞社 そのあゆみ ｢つれづれ樹｣

　朝日は９２年１月１１日朝刊１面トップで「慰安所　軍関与示す資料」と報じると、続く同日夕刊で「十一日朝から、韓国内のテレビやラジオなどでも朝日新聞を引用した形で詳しく報道された」と誇った。 　韓国紙・朝鮮日報は翌１２日朝刊で、朝日報道を引用して紹介。１３日の社説で、日本政府に対して「謝罪とともに（元慰安婦の）生存者などに応分の補償をすること」を求めた。 　吉田証言は９２年頃には虚偽と指摘されていたにもかかわらず、「史実」かのように扱った同報告については、信頼性が疑問視されている。 　朝日は吉田証言を、８２年９月２日朝刊社会面（大阪本社版）以降、少なくとも１６回にわたり繰り返し報道した。今年８月５日の特集記事「慰安婦問題を考える」で、吉田証言を初報から３２年後になってようやく虚偽と認め、取り消した。



　朝日新聞社は　1982年から
　３２年間に渡って「吉田清治証言」を１６回報道してきた。。
　　　　　　　　(共同通信社は　1,992年までに7回報道)


「吉田調書」スクープ　(東京電力福島第一原子力発電所)
　非公開の国情報を　“何故？　朝日新聞社が入手出来たのか。”
　　①　国の非公開文書を持ち出せる立場にある公務員が存在
　　②　朝日新聞社に「文書窃盗犯罪人物」と一蓮托生の方が存在。
　朝日新聞社をフィールドにして　様々な思想信条を持つ組織が
　朝日新聞社内で　活動してるのではないのか！
　この活動を許容する朝日新聞社役員が　多く存在してる。

　ジャーナリストって、言論報道の自由って、
　無条件に許されるなら、、
　国は　「悪意をもった確信犯的組織に　蹂躙される！」
　

　現に、　
　朝日新聞社は、池上彰氏に対し　言論統制を行った。。。
「報道機関　自らが言論統制を行ってる。」

　“言論報道＆表現の自由　を語り尽くす張本人”が
　自らの手で　言論統制を行ってる。

　
　歴史的事実があります。
　宗教が一番の典型ですが、宗教組織が「教会」持ったら、
　社会的使命はそこで終わります。
　教会を持った瞬間から　宗教実態は“組織至上主義”です。
　
　朝日新聞社は、
　戦前戦中　戦争を「大政翼賛的に　やり過ごしたﾏｽﾒﾃﾞｨｱ」
　朝日新聞社を維持するためなら　なんでもやるでしょう。。

　
　
　「マスが付いた“メディア”には　ジャーナリズムはない！」

　あるのは　定年退職まで朝日新聞社存続を願う思いだけ、、。


　
　http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/feature/ianfu/20140831-OYT8T50000.html?cx_text=08&from=ytop_os_txt2

　朝日新聞の一連の報道で作り上げられた「日本軍に組織的に強制連行された慰安婦」という虚構は、１９９０年代後半以降には韓国だけでなく、国連、米国などにも拡散していった。国際問題化する過程では、朝日報道を韓国メディアが引用して取り上げることで、韓国世論で日本への批判が高まり、今度は朝日がそれを再び報じるということが繰り返された。朝日と韓国のメディア、世論による一種の「共鳴」とも言える状況がみられた。


　朝日は９２年１月１１日朝刊１面トップで「慰安所　軍関与示す資料」と報じると、続く同日夕刊で「十一日朝から、韓国内のテレビやラジオなどでも朝日新聞を引用した形で詳しく報道された」と誇った。
　韓国紙・朝鮮日報は翌１２日朝刊で、朝日報道を引用して紹介。１３日の社説で、日本政府に対して「謝罪とともに（元慰安婦の）生存者などに応分の補償をすること」を求めた。
　９２年１月１６日に訪韓した宮沢喜一首相が慰安婦問題で正式に謝罪すると、韓国で朝日報道が称賛された。


　「朝日新聞が１１日、これ（軍の関与）を大々的に報道したためだった。そうでなかったならば、日本政府は今も『民間業者が連れて行った』と言い逃れをしていたかもしれない」（１６日、東亜日報）


国連に飛び火
　９６年４月、慰安婦問題は国連に飛び火した。


　国連人権委員会（国連人権理事会の前身）が、日本政府に元慰安婦への補償の支払いなどを勧告する報告書（クマラスワミ報告）を採択したのだ。報告書は、慰安婦を「軍用性奴隷」と定義した。


　採択に先立ち、朝日は９６年２月６日夕刊１面で、「元慰安婦に補償を」の見出しで報告書の内容を報じた。同じ夕刊の社会面では「戦争被害者個人への国家補償を避けてきた日本政府に対し、国連の人権専門官が明確に『ＮＯ』のサインを出した」と書いた。「『個人補償』議論の復活促すか」という解説記事も載せ、「日本政府は元慰安婦に補償するべきだ」という論調を前面に出した。


　韓国のメディアは、９２年の朝日「軍の関与」報道以降、日本政府に補償を求める傾向が鮮明になっていた。朝日報道の論調は韓国メディアと足並みがそろっていたといえる。


　国連人権小委員会は９８年８月、慰安婦問題について〈１〉実行犯の訴追〈２〉元慰安婦への補償――などを日本政府に勧告する別の報告書（マクドガル報告）も採択している。


　両報告が採択された当時の同委員会委員の一人は、「韓国の元慰安婦の支援団体や日本の民間活動団体（ＮＧＯ）が報告書の採択を求めて国連で活発にロビー活動を繰り広げていた」と証言する。


　９２年頃から、ＮＧＯ代表として、慰安婦問題を取り上げるよう国連に働きかけた中心人物が、戸塚悦朗元弁護士だ。


　国連で慰安婦を「性奴隷」と最初に表現したことで知られる戸塚氏は「日本での訴訟では補償問題は解決できないだろうと思っていた。（朝日報道で）軍の関与が明らかになり、そろそろ国連に報告する時期だなと思った」と語る。


　元慰安婦らを原告とした訴訟は日本の裁判所で続いていたが、勝訴の見込みが薄いことから、国連という「外圧」を利用したとみられる。
消えない虚偽証言


　９６年のクマラスワミ報告は、韓国で朝鮮人女性を強制連行したとした吉田清治氏（故人）の証言を根拠としていた。吉田証言は９２年頃には虚偽と指摘されていたにもかかわらず、「史実」かのように扱った同報告については、信頼性が疑問視されている。


　朝日は吉田証言を、８２年９月２日朝刊社会面（大阪本社版）以降、少なくとも１６回にわたり繰り返し報道した。今年８月５日の特集記事「慰安婦問題を考える」で、吉田証言を初報から３２年後になってようやく虚偽と認め、取り消した。


　だが、虚偽証言が消えたわけではない。元慰安婦の訴訟の原告団を組織した韓国の「太平洋戦争犠牲者遺族会」の梁順任（ヤンスニム）会長は８月、読売新聞の取材で、吉田証言について「内容は極めて詳細で、経験しなければ（証言は）不可能。内容全体がすべて虚偽などとは誰も言えない」と主張した。梁氏は、９１年に元慰安婦の金学順（キムハクスン）さんの証言をスクープした朝日の植村隆記者（当時）の義母だ。


　２００７年７月３０日、日本の同盟国・米国で下院が慰安婦問題について、日本政府に公式謝罪を求める決議を採択した。米国では、慰安婦の像などを設置する動きも続いている。


　事実に基づかない日本批判はとどまるところを知らない。（おわり）





IXYDIGITAL60(ISO50)&PHOTOSYOP
＜　生業ですが、ｱﾊﾞｳﾄです！　お気に召せば　遡って画像は　ご自由に転載
　　＆ご利用下さい。　＞
太郎さんのお薦め
　
　【杉本商会】　
　　　　http://web1.kcn.jp/ishi_hal/Welcome.html
　　　　(木工芸・杉玉・お茶を　扱われてます。）

　【十津川荘】
　　　　http://www.102k.net/
　　　　(十津川行くなら　太郎のお薦め！！！！)

以下は、エキサイト翻訳になります。
When the top of the 1st page of a morning paper reported on January 11, 92 that the morning sun is "service club army participation 示す data", it prided itself on the evening paper of the same day when it continues, saying, "The television and radio in South Korea were also reported in detail from the morning of the eleventh by the form where Asahi Shimbun was quoted." The South Korean paper and Choson Ilbo are following 12-day morning papers, and quotes and introduces a morning-sun report. With the editorial on the 13th, the Japanese government was urged "to carry out appropriate compensation to survivors (former comfort women) etc. with an apology." in spite of having indicated the Yoshida testimony to be a falsehood around 92 -- a "historical fact" -- as if -- reliability is regarded as questionable about the treated multiple address notice. The morning sun reported the Yoshida testimony repeatedly at least 16 times after the September 2, 82 morning-paper general news page (the Osaka head office version). By the special feature article on August 5, this year "a comfort-women problem is considered", it became 32 years after the first report on a news event, and the Yoshida testimony was accepted to be a falsehood at last, and was canceled. Asahi Shimbun Publishing From 1982 "Seiji Yoshida testimony" has been reported 16 times over 32 years. . (Kyodo News will report 7 times by 1,992) The "Yoshida protocol" scoop Secret (Tokyo Electric Power Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant) conditions-of-a-country news "why ? Has Asahi Shimbun Publishing obtained? " The government official in the position in which the secret document of ? country can be carried out exists. ? A "document property crime person" and the one [ share the same fate ] exist in Asahi Shimbun Publishing. Asahi Shimbun Publishing is made into the field. An organization with various thought principles is in Asahi Shimbun Publishing. Does it twist, if it is working? The Asahi Shimbun Publishing officer who permits this activity It exists mostly. If a journalist is allowed unconditionally as for speech freedom of the press, Country " devastation of is done in an Uberzeugungserbrechen organization with malice!" Actually, Asahi Shimbun Publishing receives Mr. Akira Ikegami. Freedom of speech was suppressed. . . "The press itself is suppressing freedom of speech." "The ringleader who exhausts the freedom of speech report & expression" is by its hand. Freedom of speech is suppressed. There is a historical fact. Although religion is the first type, if a religion organization "church" Has, a social mission will be finished there. From the moment of having a church The religion actual condition is an "organization supreme principle." Asahi Shimbun Publishing is during the war prewar days. It is "the mass media which it Let go past in administration-of-a-country 翼賛" about war. It is if it is for maintaining Asahi Shimbun Publishing. Anything will be done. . "There is no journalism in the "media" to which the mass was attached!" It is. Only thought which wishes the Asahi Shimbun Publishing continuation to retirement http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/feature/ianfu/20140831-OYT8T50000.html?cx_text=08&from=ytop_os_txt2 The fabrication "the comfort women by whom forcible taking was systematically done in a Japanese army" completed by the report of a series of Asahi Shimbun was diffused not only in South Korea but in the United Nations, the U.S., etc. on and after the second half of the 1990s. In the international-problem-ized process, the criticism to Japan increased with the South Korean public opinion because the South Korean media quote and take up a morning-sun report, and it was repeated that the morning sun reports it again shortly. The situation which can also be said to be a kind of "resonance" by the morning sun, South Korean media, and public opinion was seen. When the top of the 1st page of a morning paper reported on January 11, 92 that the morning sun is "service club army participation 示す data", it prided itself on the evening paper of the same day when it continues, saying, "The television and radio in South Korea were also reported in detail from the morning of the eleventh by the form where Asahi Shimbun was quoted." The South Korean paper and Choson Ilbo are following 12-day morning papers, and quotes and introduces a morning-sun report. With the editorial on the 13th, the Japanese government was urged "to carry out appropriate compensation to survivors (former comfort women) etc. with an apology." When Prime Minister Kiichi Miyazawa who visited South Korea on January 16, 92 apologized formally on the comfort-women problem, the morning-sun report was admired in South Korea. "It was because Asahi Shimbun reported this (participation of an army) on a grand scale on the 11th. If that was not right, possibly the Japanese government was doing [ still "the private sector contractor took" ] the excuse." (16 days, Dong A Ilbo) It spreads to the United Nations. In April, 96, the comfort-women problem spread to the United Nations. The report (bear ラスワミ report) in which the U.N. Commission on Human Rights (predecessor of U.N. Human Rights Council) advises the Japanese government the payment of compensation to former comfort women, etc. was adopted. The report defined comfort women as the "military slave." In advance of adoption, the morning sun reported the contents of the report by the title of "being compensation to yuan comfort women" in the 1st page of the evening paper of February 6, 96. In the general news page of the same evening paper, it wrote, "The human-rights special official of the United Nations took out the sign of "NO" clearly to the Japanese government which has avoided the reparation by the state to a war damage person individual." The interpretive article "whether it is revival 促す of "individual compensation" argument" was also carried, and the tone of argument "the Japanese government should compensate former comfort women" was pushed forward. The tendency for South Korean media to ask the Japanese government for compensation after 92 years of morning-sun "participation of army" report was clear. The tone of argument of a morning-sun report can be said for the South Korean media and a pace to have gathered. The U.N. Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights has also adopted another report (マクドガル report) which advises the Japanese government compensation-to prosecution of <1> execution offense <2> former comfort women ?? etc. about a comfort-women problem in August, 98. One of the members of a commission of those days by whom both reports were adopted testifies "South Korean former comfort women's supporting group and the Japanese nongovernmental activity organization (NGO) were developing lobbying actively in quest of adoption of a report in the United Nations." The central figure who worked on the United Nations to take up a comfort-women problem as an NGO representative around from 92 years is an Etsuro Totsuka former lawyer. Mr. Totsuka known for having expressed comfort women to a "sex slave" and the beginning in the United Nations "in the lawsuit in Japan, I thought that a compensation issue was probably unsolvable. (by morning-sun report) It is said that participation of the army became clear and I thought that it was the time soon reported to the United Nations." Although the lawsuit which made former comfort women the plaintiff continued at the court in Japan, since the hope of winning the case is slim, it is concluded that the "external pressure" called the United Nations was used. Falsehood testimony not disappearing 96 years of bear ラスワミ report made the basis Mr. Seiji Yoshida's (deceased) testimony to which it was presupposed that forcible taking of the Korean woman was carried out in South Korea. in spite of having indicated the Yoshida testimony to be a falsehood around 92 -- a "historical fact" -- as if -- reliability is regarded as questionable about the treated multiple address notice. The morning sun reported the Yoshida testimony repeatedly at least 16 times after the September 2, 82 morning-paper general news page (the Osaka head office version). By the special feature article on August 5, this year "a comfort-women problem is considered", it became 32 years after the first report on a news event, and the Yoshida testimony was accepted to be a falsehood at last, and was canceled. But, falsehood testimony did not necessarily disappear. (If Chairman 梁順任 (ヤンスニム) of the South Korean "Pacific War victim survivor's meeting" of the contents of "who organized the plaintiff team of former comfort women's lawsuit is very detailed and he will not experience about the Yoshida testimony by coverage of Yomiuri Shimbun in August, it cannot be testified for him.) The whole contents claimed, "Nobody could say all as a falsehood etc." Mr. Yana is a mother-in-law of the Takashi Uemura journalist (that time) of the morning sun which scooped of Mr. 金学順's (Kim Zia-ul-Haq Sun) of former comfort women's testimony in 91. On July 30, 2007, the House of Representatives adopted the resolution which asks the Japanese government for a formal apology about the comfort-women problem in the ally and the U.S. in Japan. The motion which installs comfort women's image etc. also continues in the U.S. A Japanese criticism which is not based on the fact does not know the place which remains. (End)